Marketers Banned from Selling Credit Repair and Mortgage Relief Services; Ordered to Pay $7.5 Million
April 22, 2010 - (RealEstateRama) — At the Federal Trade Commission’s request, a federal court has banned eight companies and their principals from selling credit repair and mortgage relief services, and ordered them to pay more than $7.5 million for deceiving consumers throughout the United States.
In February 2009, the FTC charged seven of the companies and three officers with making false promises that they would improve consumers’ credit scores by removing negative information such as late payments, charge-offs, collections, inquiries, delinquencies, judgments, and accounts discharged in bankruptcy. According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants charged consumers up to $2,000, including illegally charging an advance payment of $300, and failed to provide written contracts and other materials required by law. In August 2009, the FTC added defendants to the case, alleging that they and one of the original defendants falsely claimed they would help consumers get mortgage loan modifications or stop foreclosure in all or virtually all instances. The court entered default judgments against all of the defendants except Gerald Serino, also known as Jerry Serino, after they failed to respond to the lawsuit.
The credit repair defendants are United Credit Adjusters, Inc., doing business as United Credit Adjustors and UCA; United Credit Adjustors, Inc., d/b/a United Credit Adjusters and UCA; United Counseling Association, Inc., d/b/a UCA; Bankruptcy Masters Corp., National Bankruptcy Services Corp., Federal Debt Solutions, Ltd., United Money Tree, Inc., Ahron E. Henoch, Ezra Rishty, and Gerald Serino. The loan modification defendants are The Loan Modification Shop, Ltd., Casey Lynn Cohen, a/k/a Casey Lynn Collins, and Rishty.
The court order prohibits the credit repair companies and their owners from selling credit repair services, and it bans the loan modification companies and their individual owners from selling mortgage loan modification and foreclosure relief services. The order also prohibits the defendants from misleading consumers about financial goods and services, such as loan terms or rates, how much a consumer will save by enrolling in a debt relief service, and credit terms other than those a lender actually offers. The order also bars the defendants from misleading consumers about any good or service, such as refund terms, government affiliation, and total cost.
In addition, the order bars the defendants from trying to collect payment from their customers, and from selling or otherwise disclosing their customers’ personal or financial information. The order imposes a $7,500,334 judgment against the credit repair defendants, and a $32,710 judgment against the loan modification defendants. Litigation will continue against Serino.
The default order was entered in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on February 4, 2010.
The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,800 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.
- MEDIA CONTACT:
- Frank Dorman
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2674 - STAFF CONTACT:
- Sara DePaul
FTC’s East Central Region
216-263-3429
Source: FTC
Related posts:
- Deceptive Marketers Banned from Selling Mortgage Relief Services; One Defendant Ordered to Pay $11.5 Million
July 26, 2010 - (RealEstateRama) -- Eight marketers are banned from selling mortgage modification or foreclosure relief services under settlements with the Federal Trade Commission. The FTC alleged that the marketers charged homeowners up-front fees and falsely claimed they could get their mortgage loans modified or prevent foreclosure on their homes. The settlements in three separate actions are part of...
- FTC Settlement Orders Ban More Than A Dozen Marketers from Selling Mortgage Relief Services; Repeat Offender Ordered to Pay $11.4 Million for Contempt
WASHINGTON, D.C. - June 17, 2010 - (RealEstateRama) -- As part of the agency’s continuing crackdown on scams that prey on financially distressed homeowners, the Federal Trade Commission announced legal actions against more than a dozen marketers accused of pitching bogus mortgage modification or foreclosure relief services....
- Defendants Banned from Mortgage Foreclosure ‘Rescue’ Business
Surrendered Cash, Jewelry, and Vehicles for Consumer Refunds? WASHINGTON D.C. - March 22, 2010 - (RealEstateRama) -- The operators of a mortgage foreclosure “rescue” company will be banned from selling mortgage relief services under a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission and the states of California and Missouri, which sued them in 2009 as part of a federal-state crackdown on...
- FTC Stops Foreclosure Prevention Marketers Who Misrepresented Their Services and Misled Business Opportunity Buyers
Washington - June 22, 2009 - (RealEstateRama) — At the request of the Federal Trade Commission, a federal court has halted a bogus mortgage foreclosure prevention operation that misrepresented both the “loss mitigation” services it offered and the earnings potential of the business opportunity it sold. The FTC seeks to end this deceptive scheme and make the defendants give up...
- FTC Obtains Court Order Halting Deceptive Mortgage Relief Internet Ads; Marketers Falsely Claimed to Operate MakingHomeAffordable.gov
Washington, D.C. - May 18, 2009 - (RealEstateRama) — At the Federal Trade Commission’s request, a federal district court issued an order to stop an Internet-based operation that pretends to operate MakingHomeAffordable.gov the official Web site of the federal Making Home Affordable program for free mortgage loan assistance. The FTC alleged that the defendants deceptively diverted consumers who searched online...



Unfortunately it is true that there is a sucker born every day. Thes people prey on other’s msifortune. From the facts stated there wer very definite false promises, that people wanted to believe.
The old saying that if it seems too god to be true then it’s probably not!