Norton Announces Historic D.C. Spending Bill Passes House

National -

Bill Contains No Anti-Home-Rule Riders, $40 Million for DCTAG

WASHINGTON, D.C. – (RealEstateRama) – Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) announced that the House’s fiscal year (FY) 20 District of Columbia Appropriations bill, which contains most of her top policy and funding priorities, passed the House of Representatives today.  Among other things, the bill, for the first time since the Home Rule Act of 1973, does not appropriate D.C.’s funds; it has no anti-home-rule riders; and provides $40 million for the D.C. Tuition Assistance Grant Program (DCTAG) and increases the family income eligibility limit for DCTAG.

“I thank Subcommittee Chairman Mike Quigley and full Committee Chairwoman Nita Lowey for their continued strong support for D.C. home rule and for writing a historic bill that allows D.C. to spend its local funds without a congressional appropriation,” Norton said.  “I particularly appreciate that the bill provides $40 million for DCTAG, my program that allows thousands of D.C. students each year to attend colleges and universities across the United States in the absence of the typical state university system in the District.”

Key provisions in the bill:

  • The bill allows the District, for the first time, to spend its local funds under the Local Budget Autonomy Act, which means that the local budget passed by the D.C. Council and signed by the mayor can take effect after a congressional review period, like all other local D.C. bills.  If enacted, this bill would be the first since the Home Rule Act that D.C. could spend its local funds without a congressional appropriation of such funds.
  • The bill is free of all anti-home-rule riders. It removes the two enacted FY 19 riders—prohibitions on the District’s use of its local funds on abortion and on adult use marijuana commercialization.
  • The bill provides $40 million for DCTAG, which each of the last four enacted spending bills provided, but, with Democrats in control of the House, repeals the provision in the enacted FY 19 spending bill that reduced the family income eligibility limit from $750,000 to $500,000.
  • The bill exempts D.C. from federal government shutdowns in FY 21 in advance.  Norton has gotten annual shutdown exemptions enacted every year since the 2013 federal government shutdown.
  • The bill provides $8 million for the D.C. Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water) for ongoing work to control flooding in the District and clean up the Anacostia and Potomac Rivers and Rock Creek, the same as the enacted FY 19 level; an extra $5 million to combat HIV/AIDS in D.C., an increase of $2 million from the enacted FY 19 level; $435,000 for the Major General David F. Wherley, Jr. District of Columbia National Guard Retention and College Access Program for tuition for D.C. National Guard soldiers, the same as the enacted FY 19 level.

Earlier this week, the House Rules Committee, at Norton’s request, blocked all the anti-home-rule amendments that were filed to the bill from receiving consideration on the floor. The amendments would have blocked D.C. from using its local funds on abortions for low-income women, on carrying out the Death with Dignity Act, on carrying out the Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Act, and on passing legislation to decriminalize prostitution.

Norton is disappointed that the bill allows new students to enroll in the private school voucher program Congress imposed on the District, but is pleased the bill requires the participating private schools to comply with federal civil rights laws.  The program has failed to improve academic achievement, as measured by math and reading test scores.  Norton has tried to bring D.C. in line with congressional policy on vouchers. The D.C. voucher program is the only federally funded voucher program in the U.S.  During the last reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, amendments to create a national voucher program failed in each chamber.

###

Previous articleWyden, Young Bill Would Save Affordable Housing Units
Next articleMBA Statement on President Trump’s Executive Order on Housing Affordability