Consumer and Small Business Advocates Oppose OCC’s Plan to Offer Fintech Lending Charters

Innovation Should Not Come at the Expense of Consumer Protection, Evade State Anti-Predatory Lending Laws

CHICAGO – December 2, 2016 – (RealEstateRama) — Today, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) announced its intention to offer national charters to financial technology firms, which could severely undermine state oversight and state consumer protection laws that protect consumers and small business owners from abusive financial products and practices. The OCC is accepting comments on its framework until January 15, 2017.

Real Estate Research Center

Search the Woodstock
Woodstock

 
Before the OCC’s announcement, 49 organizations sent a letter to the Comptroller expressing “strong opposition to new federal nonbank lending charters that would enable chartered entities to avoid state interest rate caps, other state consumer protection laws, and state oversight, putting consumers and small businesses at risk.”

The OCC is accepting comments on the proposal by January 15, 2017, at .

Several leading national advocacy organizations released the following statements after the OCC made today’s announcement:

“We are disappointed that the OCC is proceeding with plans that would preempt many state laws that protect consumers and small businesses. Woodstock will continue to work to protect consumers and small business owners from predatory loans and practices,

In response to advocates’ recommendations that any such OCC fintech charter require Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)-like obligations and consumer protections, the OCC proposal would require fintechs that apply for OCC charters to ”demonstrate a commitment to financial inclusion that supports fair access to financial services and fair treatment of customers” and “ensure products and services are offered on a fair and non-discriminatory basis.” The OCC may also ask applicants to “provide the terms on which it plans to lend, including a description of the protections it plans to provide to individuals and small business borrowers,” and may “require a company to obtain approval, or no-objection, from the OCC if it departs materially from its financial inclusion plans,” said Dory Rand, President of Woodstock Institute.

“The most effective consumer protection laws at the state level should not be undermined by bad new financial products that could open the doors for predatory lending. A federally-chartered fintech lender would avoid state interest rate caps, leaving people vulnerable to financial services abuse,” said Courtney Robinson, Policy Counsel at the Center for Responsible Lending.

“At a time when the federal commitment to consumer protection is in uncertain, taking state authorities off the consumer protection beat for fintech companies is especially dangerous. The State of California uncovered violations by the fintech lender LendUp through its supervisory process, but states are blocked from investigating potential violations by national banks,” said Lauren Saunders, Associate Director of the National Consumer Law Center.

“The last time the OCC sought to charter nondepository institutions without specific statutory authority, it was blocked by the courts from doing so. The National Bank Act of 1864 does not provide an adequate, modern statutory framework to address chartering, regulation, and resolution of nondepostitory institutions,” said Brian Simmonds Marshall, policy counsel at Americans for Financial Reform.

“While the fintech industry has the potential to expand lending for small business owners, it is also a breeding ground for costly, and often predatory, lending practices. Small business owners often face triple-digit interest rates, questionable underwriting practices, and opaque payment terms. We know that current federal finance laws are woefully inadequate in protecting small business lenders. State financial protection laws often operate as the primary line of defense for small business borrowers. By allowing fintech companies to preempt state laws, an OCCcharter would decimate vital safeguards for business owners and further encourage exploitative lending practices,” said Michelle Sternthal, Deputy Director of Policy and Government Affairs for Main Street Alliance.

“The mortgage meltdown was caused in part by federal banking regulators pre-empting stronger state laws that would have protected homeowners from predatory home loans. We know what the ultimate result was from that. We also know that now certain some fintech companies are originating high-cost, predatory loans to California’s small businesses and consumers. An OCC charter will not provide the across-the-board protection against abuses that is needed,” said Kevin Stein, Deputy Director, California Reinvestment Coalition

Contact
Dory Rand
(312) 368-0310

About Woodstock

Woodstock Institute is a leading nonprofit research and policy organization in the areas of equitable lending, wealth creation, and safe and affordable financial products and services. Woodstock Institute works locally and nationally to create a financial system in which lower-wealth persons and communities of color can safely borrow, save, and build wealth so that they can achieve economic security and community prosperity.

SHARE
Woodstock Institute

Trusted research, policy, and advocacy organization advancing causes of financial justice, economic security, and community prosperity.

Contact:

Phone: (312) 368-0310
Fax: (312) 368-0316

Previous articleJLL Tops Inaugural “JUST 100” List for the Real Estate Industry
Next articleCONSTRUCTION FIRMS ADD 19,000 JOBS IN NOVEMBER AS SECTOR HITS EIGHT-YEAR HIGH IN EMPLOYMENT, BUT DROP IN INFRASTRUCTURE SPENDING SLOWS GROWTH